When homeowners begin searching for a custom home designer, they almost always start with the same criterion: the portfolio. They want to see beautiful images — dramatic elevations, soaring interiors, homes that take their breath away. And that instinct is not wrong. Aesthetics matter. Design sensibility matters.
But here is what I have learned after more than thirty years in residential design and construction: the portfolio tells you what a designer can imagine. It tells you almost nothing about what will happen once those drawings reach a builder's hands.
The Gap Between Design and Construction
The residential design industry has a structural problem that most homeowners never see until it is too late. The vast majority of designers and architects have never built a home. They have never stood on a slab at six in the morning coordinating with a framing crew. They have never received their own drawings on a job site and discovered that a detail they specified cannot be built as drawn.
This matters because the gap between a beautiful drawing and a buildable home is where custom home budgets go to die. When a designer specifies a dramatic cantilever without understanding the structural steel required to support it, the cost is not a design revision — it is a $40,000 engineering change order discovered during framing. When a floor plan positions HVAC supply runs in a ceiling cavity that is three inches too shallow, the fix is not a phone call — it is a dropped soffit that compromises the design intent of every room it touches.
These are not hypothetical scenarios. They are Tuesday. I spent over twenty years as a custom home builder, and I saw them on nearly every project where the designer had never held a hammer.
What Construction Experience Actually Provides
A designer who has built homes brings something to the drafting table that cannot be taught in school or learned from books: the ability to see construction consequences in design decisions.
When I draw a floor plan, I am not just arranging rooms. I am running mechanical systems in my mind — will the HVAC ducts have a path from the equipment to every supply register? I am thinking about structural load paths — does this open-concept great room require a steel beam, and if so, where does it bear? I am considering the construction sequence — can the framing crew build this wall before or after the adjacent one is sheathed?
This is what we call The Builder's Eye — a review process that evaluates every design across seven critical dimensions: structural feasibility, material availability, mechanical coordination, constructability, cost transparency, code compliance, and detail resolution. It is not an add-on service. It is embedded in every decision we make from the first sketch forward.
The Questions You Should Be Asking
When evaluating a designer for your custom home, the portfolio should be your starting point — not your decision criterion. Here are the questions that actually predict whether your project will stay on budget and on schedule:
Have you ever built a home yourself? Not supervised. Not consulted. Built. There is no substitute for the knowledge that comes from standing in a trench, reading your own drawings through a builder's eyes, and discovering what works and what does not.
How do you coordinate with structural and MEP engineers? If the answer is "we send the drawings out after design is complete," that is a red flag. Engineering coordination should happen during design, not after it. Late-stage engineering review is the single largest source of change orders in custom home construction.
What do builders say about your documents? A designer's relationship with builders is enormously telling. Builders who regularly receive clear, coordinated, and complete documents will say so. Builders who regularly receive ambiguous drawings padded with "verify in field" notes will also tell you — if you ask.
Can you walk me through how a specific design decision in your portfolio affected construction? A designer with construction experience will have immediate, specific answers. They will tell you about the bearing wall they moved to eliminate a steel beam, the ceiling height they adjusted to accommodate ductwork, the roof pitch they modified to avoid a complex valley that would have leaked within five years.
Beautiful and Buildable Are Not Opposites
There is a persistent myth in residential design that construction-informed design is somehow less creative, less beautiful, or more conservative. The opposite is true. When you understand what is structurally possible, materially available, and mechanically coordinated, you can push design further — not less. You can create dramatic spaces with confidence because you know they will stand up, seal tight, and stay on budget.
The homes in our portfolio are beautiful. But what you cannot see in the images is equally important: the construction documents behind them were priced within budget by multiple builders, the engineering was coordinated before permit submission, and the details were drawn clearly enough that no builder had to guess.
That is the quiet, invisible value of construction experience. It does not announce itself. It simply prevents the problems that would have cost you $50,000 and six months if they had been discovered on the job site instead of on the drafting table.
The Most Expensive Line Item
After twenty years of building homes and another decade of designing them, I return to the same truth again and again: the most expensive line item on any custom home is the one that was not in the original documents.
A portfolio shows you what a designer can dream. Construction experience shows you whether those dreams will survive contact with reality. Choose both — but if you have to prioritize, prioritize the one that protects your investment.
If you are beginning to plan a custom home and want to understand what construction-informed design looks like in practice, we welcome the conversation. A brief introductory call is always free and carries no obligation.